|
Islamizing Indonesia
Michael
Vatikiotis: International Herald Tribune
SATURDAY, SEPTEMBER 3, 2005
SINGAPORE: Amid global
fears about the spread of Islamic militancy, the last thing anyone wants to hear
about is creeping fundamentalism in Indonesia, the world's largest Muslim
nation. But these fears have become more palpable in recent weeks.
Indonesia's highest Muslim body has
issued religious edicts banning mixed marriages, religious pluralism and
interfaith prayers. A series of attacks has forced the closure of Christian
churches. And in the province of Aceh, where the government has reached an
agreement with the pro-independence movement to end a long-running insurgency, a
woman was publicly flogged and more than a dozen men have been caned in the past
three months for breaching newly introduced Shariah, or Islamic law.
Some Indonesians are worried about
the trend this pattern of events suggests. As many as seven districts in
Indonesia, from West Java to South Sulawesi and Madura, already have enforced
some kind of Shariah, something they can do under Indonesia's wide-ranging
autonomy law.
The
liberal Muslim scholar Syafi'i Anwar complains about what he calls the "creeping
Shariah-ization of Indonesia." He frets that the country's political leadership
is paying no attention to the spread of Islamic law, which he believes is poorly
understood and manipulated by local politicians to bolster their popularity.
"Indonesia has no credible religious leaders, and we don't know where we are
heading," he laments.
Indeed, the untimely death on Monday
of one of Indonesia's most prominent liberal Islamic scholars, Nurcholish
Madjid, leaves a huge gap in a country where crude religious rhetoric mixing
dogma with mysticism finds a ready audience among people who have given up
expecting justice from secular quarters.
Lately, President Susilo Bambang
Yudhoyono has sought to allay concerns that Indonesia was drifting toward
fundamentalism. "You may read from time to time the voice of small radical
groups," Yudhoyono said. "But this voice will not change the fact that
mainstream Indonesia will continue to be moderate, tolerant and democratic."
Democracy means that extremists can
express themselves more freely. One of the 11 fatwas issued by the influential
Council of Ulama at the end of July states that Islamic interpretations based on
liberalism, secularism and pluralism "contradict Islamic teachings." The fear in
conservative Islamic circles is that political openness will erode religious
values and allow proselytizing by Christians.
Indonesians have already rejected
the idea of their country becoming an Islamic state, however, and are not
inclined to vote for hard-line Islamic parties. Two years ago Indonesian
legislators voted to reject the insertion of Shariah provisions in the country's
constitution.
Most Indonesians are not moved by
rigid religious dogma. The middle ground in Indonesian politics is secular and
tolerant, and for any avowedly Islamic party to win a majority it would need to
cast off any notion of altering the basis of a state that is home to millions of
Christians and Hindus as well. A popular grassroots party, the Prosperous
Justice Party, was forced to subordinate support for Shariah to a secular reform
platform in its manifesto - though many suspect that the party still promotes
Shariah
But in a country where democracy is
new and political parties are still underdeveloped, religion is a powerful
mobilizing force and is subject to exploitation for political ends. Witness how
hard it has been for the government to ban known terrorist organizations like
Jemaah Islamiyah for fear of alienating support. The Ministry of Religious
Affairs refuses to bring charges against Muslims who have forced the closure of
almost two dozen churches in recent weeks, blaming Christians instead for not
seeking legal permits to worship.
The use of Shariah for political
ends is even more worrying, as this has a lasting impact on society. In Aceh,
Shariah was introduced as a government ploy to draw off popular support for
Aceh's independence movement. The idea was that Shariah would help impart a
sense of autonomy and Islamic identity and persuade the long-suffering Acehnese
that Jakarta was giving them what they wanted
Under Shariah, women in Aceh must
wear head scarves and are less free to mingle with men. Public floggings for
convicted gamblers and drinkers have already taken place. Yet in more liberal
quarters of Acehnese society there has been an outcry over the barbarity and
abuse of human rights that public caning involves
The problem with mixing Islam and
politics is that a dogmatic view tends to prevail because of Muslims' fears of
being branded apostates. Indonesia is not becoming an Islamic state anytime
soon, but its political leaders are prone to exploiting Islam for short-term
ends that could have lasting consequences
Michael Vatikiotis is a visiting
research fellow at the Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, Singapore.
|