Saturday
27 August 2005
Less than three weeks before a UN
summit opens, the 191 UN member states have finally agreed to let about 30
nations take the lead in trying to resolve major differences in a document that
world leaders can then adopt.
The United States has submitted
hundreds of proposed amendments to the 39-page draft currently on the table, and
Russia, the Non-Aligned Movement representing 116 mainly developing countries,
and dozens of other countries have submitted hundreds more.
General Assembly President Jean
Ping said the "core group" representing all regions and groups at the United
Nations would start negotiations on Monday and was prepared to work nights to
finalise a document by 2 September if possible.
The
text would then be submitted to member states on 6 September for approval, and
sent for translation into the UN's six official languages, he said.
"We have to work hard, and we'll do
everything in order to produce an outcome," Ping said after a closed-door
meeting of representatives from all countries.
Crucial issues
The negotiators will be focusing on seven key issues where there are still
serious differences:
Defining and tackling terrorism
Disarmament and non-proliferation
A new Human Rights Council to
replace the discredited Human Rights Commission
A new Peace building Commission
to help countries emerging from conflict
Overhauling UN management
Taking collective action to
protect people against genocide
Actions to fight poverty and
promote development.
But
any other issue in the document can also be raised, and even though about 30
countries will be leading the negotiations, any other UN member state can step
in with proposals during the negotiations, Ping said.
He said the key negotiators would
include the five permanent Security Council members - the United States, Russia,
China, Britain and France - as well as Malaysia, which currently heads the
Non-Aligned Movement, Japan, India, Pakistan and representatives from every
region.
"I think we're making progress," US
ambassador John Bolton said. "We're prepared to be flexible on format and
process. We want a strong outcome document."
Agreement elusive
He called the US agreement with the Non-Aligned Movement - that all governments
should be able to contribute and that the entire text should be open - "a good
sign".
"We're very pleased about this,"
Bolton said. "We're moving ahead."
While Bolton raised the possibility
of the summit adopting just a short declaration, Ping said negotiators would be
working on the 39-page draft - and may decide in addition to issue a two or
three page declaration.
Whether
the 191 UN member states will be able to reach agreement on the substantive
issues in the document remains to be seen.
Because time is so short,
Pakistan's UN ambassador Munir Akram said it would be difficult to bridge the
differences - but possible.
"We have said right from the start
that without negotiations, this document is not going anywhere," he said.
"This is important for our leaders
- to have an outcome, to have something that they can adopt when they are coming
together on the 60th anniversary [of the United Nations]," Akram said.
"It will be a bad reflection on the
United Nations, and all our leaders, if we are not able to agree. So we have all
got a stake on reaching agreement at least on the maximum possible number of
issues."
Comprehensive agreement
Britain's UN ambassador Emyr Jones
Parry, whose country holds the European Union presidency, said the EU
"wholeheartedly" supported Ping's proposal for negotiations.
The challenge now, he said, was to
turn the draft into a comprehensive agreement.
"Our heads of government want
something that tackles tomorrow's problems, revitalises multilateralism and the
United Nations," Jones Parry said. "That's what the European Union will press
for."
For the Non-Aligned Movement, the
top priority is development - and action to meet UN goals that include cutting
extreme poverty by half, ensuring universal primary education, and stemming the
Aids pandemic, all by 2015.
Bolton explained in a letter to all
UN member states on Friday that the proposed US amendments eliminated all
references to the Millennium Development Goals in the draft because Washington
opposes a goal calling on donor countries to spend 0.7% of GNP on development
aid.
He said in the letter that the
target was added in a UN report in 2001 on implementing goals adopted at the UN
Millennium Summit in 2000, and was never "formally adopted" by member states.
On Thursday, a UN report said the
US spent 0.16% of GNP on international assistance in 2004. By contrast, all EU
countries have committed to reach the 0.7% target by 2015.