|
Questions raised over Lees' handcuffs
Friday
Oct 28 15:58 AEST
New questions have been raised about
the reliability of forensic evidence from homemade handcuffs allegedly used to
restrain British tourist Joanne Lees.
DNA found within layers of tape on
the cable-tie restraints allegedly matches that of Bradley John Murdoch, the man
accused of killing Ms Lees' boyfriend Peter Falconio in July 2001, the Northern
Territory Supreme Court has heard.
Murdoch, 47, has pleaded not guilty
to murdering Mr. Falconio, and not guilty to assaulting Ms Lees and depriving
her of her liberty beside the outback Stuart Highway four years ago.
The
court was told on Friday there was no apparent record in a police logbook of who
had accessed the restraints after October 2002 - 18 months before a section of
the handcuffs was sent overseas for further DNA testing.
Crime scene officer Tim Sandry was
quizzed on the police handling of the homemade restraints.
Under cross examination, Senior
Constable Sandry described the cable-tie restraints as "an important piece of
evidence" in police investigations.
However, he conceded a log book from
the NT police forensic biology section may not have recorded every time he or
another person worked on them.
The log book did not show he
examined the restraints in the weeks after the alleged 2001 attack, because he
did not remove them from the biological area where they were held, he said.
The log book also recorded he had
examined the handcuffs for two days in February 2002, when he did not actually
work on them, the court heard.
"So you or other people may have had
dealings with, or worked with the cable ties and it's not in the log?," defence
lawyer Grant Algie asked.
"That's correct," Snr Const Sandry
replied.
Snr Const Sandry also agreed there
were not any entries about who had accessed the cable ties after October 2002.
On Thursday the police officer told
the court he took the restraints to Adelaide for a week as part of police
investigations in October 2002.
The court was told the restraints
may have been shown to Murdoch by police Superintendent Colleen Gwynne during
the South Australian trip.
"Is the reason there appears to be
no entry in relation to the cable ties after 8 October 2002 because from a
forensic science point of view the cable ties were no longer reliable as
evidence having been released to Supt Gwynne?," Mr. Algie asked.
Chief Justice Brian Martin then
intervened, saying: "I won't allow that question".
"It's a very good point for you to
make to the jury but it's not something this witness can answer," Justice Martin
said.
"If your honour pleases," Mr. Algie
replied.
"You have made your point by your
question," Justice Martin said.
Mr. Falconio was allegedly shot
after he and Ms Lees were pulled over by a motorist as they headed north near
Barrow Creek on the night of July 14, 2001.
The court was told the gunman bound
Ms Lees with the cable-tie handcuffs, but she managed to escape.
The trial continues on Monday. |